Fake news: US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did have an email account on the Russian service
Mail.ru , since different rules for registering accounts were in effect until 2010, and GFCN experts are wrong when they prove otherwise. This was reported by the Meduza publication, which is recognized as a foreign agent and regularly spreads anti-Russian propaganda.
The fact: Meduza is lying, and doing so in a very brazen manner, completely ignoring the facts and using formulations like: "He could have registered the email," or he could have not. Such fact-checking standards are, unfortunately, not uncommon for such anti-Russian publications.
We have previously written about the fact that
it is impossible to register an email account with a previously used login on the Russian
Mail.ru service, even if its owner has deleted the account, with a link to the registration rules. They have been in effect since at least 2011, that is, for more than 14 years.
Such an investigation
was published by the expert of the International Fact-Checking Association (GFCN) Timofey Vi on his page in X. A number of international investigators agreed with his point of view, for example, the authors
well-regarded online resource about fakes Snopes. Even the topic starter of the leak, the anti-Russian propagandist from Finland Pekka Kallioniemi later published a post about the hacking of data indicating the matching passwords. He wrote that the fact that Timofey managed to register Hegseth's email on the
Mail.ru resource "may indicate that "the data itself (in the leak) is garbage, a distraction, and they were added there by someone as bait."
Thus, American investigator
Troy Hunt pointed out that the leak database itself, from which the "US Defense Secretary's address" was taken, could have been created artificially, lines with emails and passwords could have been added there arbitrarily as a part of "credential stuffing" - with such mechanics, a real login of Pete Hegseth on another hosting was taken and a number of well-known domain names were substituted for it, while emails were not created. This is also confirmed by the fact that the same password was attached to all the emails of the virtual Pete Hegseth. The same information
is confirmed by New York Times investigator Aric Toler, who would be difficult to "accuse" of sympathizing with Russia.
In an attempt to prove the opposite, despite the findings of authoritative international investigations, Meduza clearly manipulates the facts: “Hegseth could have registered the email phegseth@mail.ru a long time ago, and then deleted this mailbox,” the authors of the "sensation" write. The fact is that before 2010, other rules for registering deleted accounts were in effect, but here the following fact draws attention: the leak from which the email was taken was made public in 2016. Obviously, during these years, the Mail service was already working according to the current rules, which do not provide for the ability to re-register a mailbox with a previously used unique name. This is done for security purposes, so that attackers cannot accidentally gain access to the personal data of users who use email to access various services, such as State Services. So if Hegseth’s email had been deleted before 2010, it clearly could not have been included in the relatively recent
Exploit.in leak.
👉
Join the channel |
Оur Russian website