In his 1897 article "Consumption Not Contagious," Dr. Charles Dulles observed that declines in tuberculosis cases were the result of manipulated statistics, insurance fraud, and pressured physicians relabeling cases as other disease such as pneumonia, bronchitis, and congestion.

For over two centuries, tactics like statistical manipulation and renaming diseases have been used to make it seem like treatments and vaccines ended outbreaks — like with smallpox and polio. In reality, the game was played with labels.

https://viroliegy.com/2024/06/28/the-magic-trick/

Source:

https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101183613-bk

For more on the TB fraud:

https://viroliegy.com/category/tuberculosis/

For more from Dr. Dulles, please see his critique of rabies:

https://viroliegy.com/2025/02/20/pasteurs-method-of-treating-hydrophobia/

Jamie’s legal expertise is impressive: no evidence, but plenty of moral outrage. He’s out here accusing people like myself and @RealJermWarfare of crimes—apparently unaware that making false criminal accusations can be…well, a crime. But sure, we’re the cult. 🤷‍♂️

Forget AI. Children who understand that indirect evidence doesn’t prove the existence of Santa Claus outsmart "virus experts."

Source:

https://time.com/7279010/ai-virus-lab-biohazard-study/

For more on how virologists trick themselves with indirect, pseudoscientific evidence:

https://viroliegy.com/2023/09/08/the-indirect-approach/

Patient: hiccups, no other symptoms.
MRI normal. Vitals normal. Bloodwork clear for flu & RSV.
Later tests positive for "SARS-COV-2."
Treatment: flu drug, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories—no effect.
Then: antipsychotic. Hiccups stop.
Diagnosis: “Virus.”
Science: unfalsifiable.

Source:

https://www.livescience.com/health/diagnostic-dilemma-a-man-had-hiccups-for-5-days-and-a-virus-may-have-been-to-blame

Remember, the truth is always hidden in plain sight. Fear is the only real “virus” that spreads instantly from person to person. It’s a powerful emotion—manipulated and weaponized to corral and control us.

Once you break free from the fear “virus,” no other “virus” can ever be used to control you again.

https://viroliegy.com/2024/11/07/fear-is-the-real-virus/

Dr. Michel Peter, French physician & member of the Académie de Médecine (and Pasteur’s cousin by marriage), was a fierce critic. He accused Pasteur of creating diseases like anthrax & rabies through the very vaccines meant to prevent them.

Source:

https://archive.org/details/b28067393

For more on Pasteur's anthrax and rabies fraud, please see these articles:

https://viroliegy.com/category/rabies/

Prophecy or pre-planned script? Did Ryo Tatsuki really predict events like 'Covid-19'—or was she revealing insider knowledge disguised as prophecy? Has she been tipped off about something coming in 2030? They always tell us… just hidden in symbols.

Source:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/did-japans-baba-vanga-just-predict-the-return-of-a-deadly-virus-like-covid-heres-what-she-said/articleshow/120434734.cms

For more on how symbolism is used in the media and how these events are pre-planned, check out these articles:

1. https://mikestone.substack.com/p/uncovering-the-corona-fraud-part-a2c

2. https://mikestone.substack.com/p/planning-the-next-pandemic

Any story about a “virus” origin is just a tactic to mislead the public. What’s truly shameful is the demonization of those who expose the lack of scientific evidence behind germ "theory" and virology. This is fear propaganda aimed at control, not health.

Source:

https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/04/18/g-s1-61324/lab-leak-white-house-covid-origins

To understand the fraud taking place, please see this article:

https://viroliegy.com/2025/04/17/intro-to-viroliegy/

Updated: “Introduction to ViroLIEgy” v2.0 is live. A deeper dive into the failures of germ “theory” that led to the invention of the “virus” concept—now with expanded arguments, historical context, and links that flesh it all out.

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/intro-to-viroliegy

Updated: “Introduction to ViroLIEgy” v2.0 is live. A deeper dive into the failures of germ “theory” that led to the invention of the “virus” concept—now with expanded arguments, historical context, and links that flesh it all out.

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/intro-to-viroliegy

When it comes to autism: "It’s incredibly complex with hundreds of genetic and environmental factors!"
But for so-called "infectious" diseases like AIDS: "It’s this one invisible thing. Trust us."
Funny how multifactorial causation seems to only apply when it’s not a "virus." 🤔

Source:

https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/04/16/nx-s1-5366676/autism-cdc-rates-rfk-research

For more on Pasteur's fraudulent methods, please see these articles:

1. https://viroliegy.com/2024/05/23/the-germ-hypothesis-part-1-pasteurs-problems/

2. https://viroliegy.com/2025/02/20/pasteurs-method-of-treating-hydrophobia/

3. https://viroliegy.com/2022/08/08/rabies-the-virus-of-fear/

4. https://viroliegy.com/2022/02/25/louis-pasteurs-unethical-rabies-fraud/

Pasteur, usually secretive, let outsiders observe his rabies work for 3 weeks. Even with rabid rabbits from him, they failed to replicate his results. After deaths linked to his vaccine, critics used these failures to challenge the method’s legitimacy.

Pasteur dismissed the failures of De Renzi, Amoroso (Naples), and Abreu (Lisbon). But Professor von Frisch was harder to ignore—he stated Pasteur failed to refute his evidence and warned the vaccine shouldn’t be used on man.

What does it say about Pasteur’s methods if his results repeatedly failed independent replication—a cornerstone of science?

Sources:

1. https://archive.org/details/privatescienceof0000geis

2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20212253

The brilliant Dr. Mari Arce has a new book coming out titled Germs Are Not Our Enemy! — launching soon! Check out her new website and watch the exciting trailer promoting this groundbreaking work. Be sure to pre-order your copy of what’s sure to be an insightful and empowering read!

https://www.germsarenotourenemy.com/

The brilliant @drarce has a new book coming out titled Germs Are Not Our Enemy! — launching soon! Check out her new website and watch the exciting trailer promoting this groundbreaking work. Be sure to pre-order your copy of what’s sure to be an insightful and empowering read!

https://www.germsarenotourenemy.com/

Some believe Robert Koch won the Nobel Prize for proving the TB bacterium causes disease in humans. But that’s incorrect. His award was for discovering the bacterium — not for proving causation. In fact, Koch couldn’t even satisfy his own postulates designed to establish a cause.

https://viroliegy.com/2025/04/14/tb-or-not-tb/

The FDA is phasing out animal testing for drugs — which sounds great, since it could end animal torture. But the replacement? AI models and organoids. So drugs meant for humans will be tested on computers and lab-grown cells, not living organisms. Is that really progress?

Maybe the bright side of using AI models to “prove” drug effectiveness is that more people will wake up to the madness and stop taking toxic pharmaceuticals altogether.

Source:
https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/10/health/fda-animal-testing-drug-approval/index.html

For how animals are tortured:

https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/10/chickenpox-shingles-no-transmission/

https://viroliegy.com/2022/04/23/the-shope-papillomavirus-the-precusor-to-hpv/

https://viroliegy.com/2024/08/23/lost-found/

Why do you need to be told whether you have allergies or a cold? Because the symptoms are the same—only the label changes. Whether it's "allergic" or "viral" rhinitis, the experience is identical. The difference lies in the story, not the symptoms.

Source:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/conditions/cold-flu/your-hay-fever-might-be-one-of-these-four-spring-viruses/

For more on how the only difference is the label and the story sold for the same symptoms of disease, see this article:

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/common-allergies-or-the-seasonal

Bacteriophages became the model for "infectious viruses" based on bacterial culture lysis—yet lysis is admitted to occur without any "virus" present. Early microbiologists observed this lysis often, but called it autolysis—not "infection." No one proposed "infectious" agents.

Rather than investigate a new cause, researchers saw lysis as a methodological error and repeated experiments. They didn’t see it as a biological phenomenon needing explanation. The idea of phages wasn't drawn directly from the observations, but applied later as a reinterpretation.

Source:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33050848/

For more on how bacteriophages were erroneously manufactured into the model for "pathogenic viruses," please see this article:

https://viroliegy.com/2023/10/07/the-virus-model/

Highly regarded British physician and medical author Dr. Charles Creighton, considered the most learned British medical scholar of the 19th century, denounced the germ "theory" of disease and vaccination. For this, he was relegated to the fringes of the medical community and ignored.

Source:

https://archive.org/details/virushistoryofco0000hugh/mode/1up?q=Midpoint&view=theater

For more prominent, marginalized voices speaking out against the germ "theory" and vaccination:

1. https://viroliegy.com/2023/10/06/the-germ-theory-house-of-cards/

2. https://viroliegy.com/2024/05/09/who-are-the-quacks/

3. https://viroliegy.com/2024/08/23/lost-found/

4. https://viroliegy.com/2021/11/28/vaccination-proved-useless-and-dangerous-1889/

Dr. Mark Bailey’s “A Farewell to Virology” is a masterful takedown of “Covid-19” & virology. First a free essay, then a powerful 3-part documentary—now available in a beautiful hardcover including “Virology’s Event Horizon” & “Virus, Bacteriophage and Single ‘Virus’ Genomics.”

If you’d like to support the Baileys’ work, consider buying a copy for yourself—or for someone who needs to understand the depth of the virology fraud.

https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/

Please see this article for my take on Mark's amazing work, with links to the documentary and his other brilliant piece, "The COVID-19 Fraud & War on Humanity."

https://viroliegy.com/2022/09/16/dr-mark-bailey-bids-farewell-to-virology/

Robert Kennedy Jr. is handing out vaccines and praising MMR as "the most effective way to prevent the spread of measles."

Big Pharma’s really shaking in their boots. Any day now. 😒

This is all easier to understand once you realize that RFK Jr. was never against vaccines.

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/the-anti-anti-vaccine-kennedy

I was alerted to a Spanish article that supposedly challenged me. I was ready to rebut—until I realized there was nothing to rebut. Just a lazy hit piece built on a genetic fallacy.

Also, I have no books on Amazon. To the author: get your facts straight before writing. 🤦‍♂️

For anyone curious what a sloppy attempt to dismiss a position looks like, feel free to translate and read it for yourself.

https://badajozylaguerraincivil.blogspot.com/2025/03/viroliegy.html#comment-form

The germ "theory" of disease became the perfect scapegoat for those poisoning the environment—letting them hijack healthcare, banish naturopathy, and sell back their toxic waste as "cures" to the unsuspecting public.

https://viroliegy.com/2025/04/04/the-snake-oil-tycoon/

The germ "theory" of disease was the perfect scapegoat for those who were poisoning the environment and creating disease to take control of the healthcare system, banish naturopathy, and sell their waste products as cures to the unsuspecting public.

https://viroliegy.com/2025/04/04/the-snake-oil-tycoon/

If I had groundbreaking evidence to dismantle PCR, I wouldn’t withhold it—especially from those who crowdfunded an "open-source" project. But if someone didn’t have that evidence, I could see why they might resort to false accusations to avoid admitting it.

https://x.com/ViroLIEgy/status/1898749461624447176

In 1909, Robert Koch inferred "viruses" existed because disease persisted despite bacteria being filtered out. This is begging the question—assuming an invisible microbe must be the cause. This is a core fallacy continued to be employed by virologists today.

Robert Koch also committed affirming the consequent: "If viruses exist, disease occurs; disease occurs, so viruses exist."

For more on the fallacious reasoning utilized by virologists:

https://viroliegy.com/2024/09/05/viroliegy-101-logical-fallacies/

For more on the "virus" concept:

https://viroliegy.com/2024/03/29/the-virus-concept/

Virologists can't agree if "viruses" are alive, dead, or something in between—but they're sure these Schrödinger’s enigmas are out to get you. Sounds more like a script from "The Walking Dead" than science.

Source:

https://theconversation.com/how-viruses-blur-the-boundaries-of-life-230802

For more on the inability of virologists to agree on whether their fictional boogeyman are dead or alive:

https://viroliegy.com/2023/11/10/inventing-the-nature-of-viruses/

Williams noted that "virus" identification requires more than images. A disease must first be established, & a distinct particle must be consistently correlated with it. He warned that EM’s visual appeal makes it vulnerable to misuse, leading researchers to see what they expect.

Source:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065352708605333

For more on the importance of purification and isolation:

https://viroliegy.com/category/purification-isolation/

For more on why EM images alone are not direct proof of "pathogenic viruses."

https://viroliegy.com/category/electron-microscope-images/

Williams acknowledged that EM is often used on impure samples and cannot conclusively identify "virus" particles. He emphasized that EM can only show a correlation between a particle’s presence and an associated activity, but this does not demonstrate causation.

Williams admitted that EM has technical limitations, making interpretations subjective. He noted the mental leap from grayscale images to assuming a "virus" is present and questioned whether they can ever be certain they're truly observing an "infectious" entity.

Williams discussed how "viruses" were identified in impure preparations. He stated that TMV could be identified in impure samples because of its rod-like shape, assuming all rod-like particles are the "virus." He noted EM could not identify unknown "viruses" in impure samples.

In 1954, Robley Williams noted that "virus" particles need to be purified (freed of contaminants, host materials, etc.) to the highest degree possible in order to draw a faithful and unambiguous conclusion they are the "virus." This was not the case for those already identified.

Jamie and his associates' attacks are becoming more outlandish by the minute. I applaud Dr. Tom Cowan for taking the necessary step of blocking those who resort to slanderous lies and vulgarity. There's no justification for these attempts to sow division.

https://x.com/drtomcowan/status/1905712766792638706

A 1964 paper reported that plants deliberately "infected" with an inoculant claimed to contain the tobacco mosaic "virus" (TMV) did not produce a single "viral" particle when examined using electron microscopy.

"Viral" particles were not detected at any stage, despite cytopathogenic effects occurring in the "infected" plants. Researchers suggested that CPE resulted from metabolic disruption, not "viral" replication—meaning the damage did not require a "virus" at all.

Source:

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d11d/633e0edc1f654acdf0dc5d8a287ee3fe5b24.pdf

For more on TMV and how the "virus" concept was created, please see this article:

https://viroliegy.com/2024/03/29/the-virus-concept/

In 1957, virologist Robley Williams admitted that early "viruses" were "found" using electron microscopy without solid evidence that the particles were actually "viruses." He noted that numerous claims in the literature were made based solely on the appearance of the particles.

Source:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0074769608618045

For more information on the flaws in electron microscopy imaging, please see these articles:

1. https://viroliegy.com/category/electron-microscope-images/

2. https://viroliegy.com/2025/03/20/virus-like-particles/

A little over a year ago, Lies Are Unbekoming invited me to my first written interview, allowing me to answer at my own pace and provide in-depth sources. The thought-provoking questions and great response made it a fantastic experience.

This year, I was invited back for another round—covering topics from Pasteur’s rabies work to measles, "antibodies," "viral" genomes, and much more. Despite a busier schedule, I enjoyed tackling these excellent questions.

I hope you find the interview as engaging as I did—check out Lies Are Unbekoming for more insightful discussions!

https://unbekoming.substack.com/cp/159911670

Please check out what is sure to be an insightful and entertaining conversation on the role of bacteria, mycrozyma, pleomorphism & and more between two men I have a great deal of respect for: @Alec_Zeck and @JacobDiazTheUV.

https://thewayfwrd.com/podcast/ep-156-germs-are-friends-the-role-of-bacteria-mycrozyma-pleomorphism-more-with-jacob-diaz/

The term "NoVirusINC" was coined by failed HIV dissident Rod Knoll and has been adopted by Jamie Andrews and others. It serves as a divisive tactic to create distrust among those exposing the fraud of virology. The real question is: who benefits from this division?

They attempt to frame those who critically analyze the published literature as offering nothing but "baseless opinions" while portraying their own experiments as the only substantive approach. However, this outlook is flawed, as I recently explained.

https://viroliegy.com/2025/03/20/virus-like-particles/

For more on the ways in which they are attempting to sow distrust and division, please refer to these articles.

1. https://mikestone.substack.com/p/the-hunt

2. https://mikestone.substack.com/p/out-of-control

Some think virology's cell culture methods are scientific—or could be if "properly controlled." Nothing could be further from the truth. Science requires a hypothesis based on an observed natural phenomenon—something entirely absent from cell culture experiments from the start.

For more on the scientific method and what constitutes scientific evidence, please see these articles:

https://viroliegy.com/category/science-101/

For more on why cell cultures are pseudoscience, please see these articles:

https://viroliegy.com/category/cell-culture/

Some argue that we must conduct new experiments to disprove virology. However, a critical analysis of the existing literature is sufficient—experiments debunking virology have already been published. Linked is a critical analysis of electron microscopy.

Declaring random particles as "pathogenic viruses" with no scientific evidence—then labeling other particles as "viruses" just because they look similar—isn't science. It's circular reasoning, baseless assumption, and pure pseudoscience.

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/virus-like-particles

Some argue that we must conduct new experiments to disprove virology. However, a critical analysis of the existing literature is sufficient—experiments debunking virology have already been published. Linked is a critical analysis of electron microscopy.

Declaring random particles as "pathogenic viruses" with no scientific evidence—then labeling other particles as 'viruses' just because they look similar—isn't science. It's circular reasoning, baseless assumption, and pure pseudoscience.

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/virus-like-particles

Perhaps virologists use fetal bovine serum (FBS) in cell cultures to create "viruses" rather than human serum because "virus-like" particles are routinely found in FBS—even when labeled "virus-free"—whereas these same particles are absent in human serum. 🤔

Source:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4834422/

For more on the unethical use of FBS:

https://viroliegy.com/2021/08/31/the-unethical-use-of-fetal-bovine-serum/

For more of the pseudoscience of cell cultures:

https://viroliegy.com/category/cell-culture/

Articles on the pseudoscience of genomics:

https://viroliegy.com/category/genomics/

More from Professor Edward Dougherty on the failure of genomics as a science:

https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/26/the-epistemological-crisis-in-genomics/

The only thing "SARS-CoV-2" changed about science was how easily people could be convinced to accept pseudoscience in its place. The scientific method was abandoned, replaced with 150,000 fictional tales and 17 million ACTGs of random nonsense—fear-mongering disguised as evidence, not genuine discovery.

Genetic sequences are crafted to tell stories, not to reveal truths about nature. As Professor Edward R. Dougherty put it, "The accumulation of data does not constitute science, nor does the a posteriori rational analysis of data." In other words, piling up sequences and retroactively fitting narratives isn’t science—it’s storytelling.

Given this disregard for scientific principles, it's no wonder researchers find their work "soul-destroying"—more like an assembly line than a real, hypothesis-driven effort to explore nature instead of fictional boogeymen.

Source:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/four-ways-the-covid-causing-virus-changed-science/

Sources:

1. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/five-volunteers-exposed-to-covid-19-virus-in-singapores-first-human-challenge-trial

2. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01284-1

3. https://undark.org/2025/01/01/lessons-covid-challenge-trials/

For more on challenge trials:

1. https://viroliegy.com/2022/02/11/challenging-sars-cov-2/

2. https://viroliegy.com/2023/04/16/challenging-influenza/

A comfy stay in spacious rooms, little "risk," & a nice payout—these challenge trials feel more like a vacation. Reminds me of the Common Cold Unit’s ‘infection’ studies (1950s-80s), where volunteers got free holidays…but no one actually got "infected."

https://viroliegy.com/2024/03/15/the-infectious-myth-busted-part-7-the-common-cold-vacation/

The lack of meaningful results has skeptics questioning challenge trials—nothing is learned, & the risks aren’t worth it. But with participants like Mr. Goh getting $6,000 for sore eyes & fatigue, it seems like a "risk" worth taking. Easy money to expose a pseudoscientific scam.

This isn’t the first failed challenge trial. Since 2021, researchers have tried repeatedly to "infect" people with "SARS-COV-2" and its "variants." Each time, only a few test positive (PCR) and show little to no symptoms. Not exactly the "deadly virus" they sold us.

A new "SARS-COV-2" challenge study in Singapore "infected" just 2 out of 5 participants, causing only sore eyes and fatigue. They injected GMP-manufactured cell culture soup into volunteers’ noses—yet still couldn’t reliably "infect" them or cause serious disease.

The presence of identical "virus-like" particles in "uninfected" cell cultures shatters the illusion that these particles uniquely represent a "pathogenic virus." Their frequent presence where they shouldn't be should have raised serious questions amongst virologists—but didn’t.

Source:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4195629/

If people were honest with themselves, they’d realize respiratory disease isn’t caused by invisible fictional boogeymen. The air we breathe is a major factor. No matter how many boosters you get, respiratory disease will persist as long as our air remains polluted.

Source:

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/only-seven-countries-met-who-air-quality-standards-2024-data-shows-2025-03-11/

For more on how air pollution impacts our health and can be mistaken for "viral" disease, please see these articles.

https://viroliegy.com/category/air-pollution/

Helmut Ruska, often credited as the first person to image a "virus," admitted that the "newly discovered structures" observed in electron microscopy could have been artificial products created by the vacuum or electron beams. In other words, not "viruses." 🤷‍♂️

For my latest on the fraud of "virus-like" particles observed in electron microscopy:

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/virus-like-particles

For related articles on EM images:

https://viroliegy.com/category/electron-microscope-images/

Before fear propaganda took over, measles was widely considered a routine childhood illness. The 1958 book "Have a Happy Measle, a Merry Mumps, and a Cheery Chickenpox" reflected this common understanding, as did a New York Times article from that era.

Pop culture reinforced this view. "The Brady Bunch" aired an episode in 1969 titled Is "There a Doctor in the House?," where the entire family catches measles—but instead of panic, it was played off as a mild inconvenience and even a joke.

https://youtu.be/5289k-dbOMY?si=LWb5YsdyN7BjpGZq

Even in 1971, the children's book "Babar and the Doctor" reassured parents that measles wasn’t a serious illness.

So what changed? A well-executed fear campaign, pushing a toxic injection, rewrote history and convinced people to fear a natural process.

Break free from the propaganda. Read more here:

https://viroliegy.com/category/measles/

This is a strawman. ☝️

Jamie’s hypothesis is based on lab experiments, not real-world observations. Until he can show evidence of genetically engineered human cells interacting with reduced fetal bovine serum leading to cell death in nature, his hypothesis remains disconnected from reality.

For more on the flaws inherent in cell cultures that render them pseudoscientific:

https://viroliegy.com/category/cell-culture/

To understand science vs pseudoscience:

https://viroliegy.com/category/science-101/