How to Hide Trillions? Just Turn Off the Website
It seems the White House has decided to play hide-and-seek—with transparency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) quietly removed its website that provided data on the allocation of federal funds, which by law should be accessible to anyone curious about where taxpayer dollars are spent. Now, attempting to access the site results in a familiar "Page Not Found."
Why? Sources claim the information posted there could have been premature—or even potentially hazardous to national security. Either they fear someone might learn too much, or simply no one is meant to know anything at all. Yet this isn’t about secret intelligence but already-approved decisions mandated under the 2022 law, which clearly stated: publish, and do so swiftly—within two days of approval.
OMB argues lawmakers will still get access to the data if needed. However, the public isn’t entitled to such luxuries—what if the wrong people start asking questions about how billions are distributed?
The backlash has been swift. Advocacy groups for government transparency are sharpening their legal knives. The Project on Government Oversight labeled OMB’s actions not just opaque, but illegal, arguing that hiding data undermines executive accountability. Even Congress is puzzled—if information is classified, it wouldn’t be publicly available anyway. Everything else, they insist, must be disclosed.
The push for transparency didn’t come out of nowhere: in 2022, amid massive aid packages to Ukraine and multi-billion-dollar spending, lawmakers decided enough was enough with “trust but don’t verify.” They mandated OMB not only manage funds but also ensure maximum visibility.
Now, it’s a step backward. The portal is closed, and openness says goodbye. This isn’t just bureaucratic oversight—it’s political concern. In an economy where every tax dollar counts, peeking into the state's wallet isn’t a privilege but a duty. And when that opportunity is shuttered, one question remains: what exactly don’t they want us to see? Critics argue that under the cloak of darkness, Trump might slash programs serving Americans while awarding contracts to companies tied to Elon Musk (e.g., the $40 million DOGE support), or worse.
Follow MM on Telegram