Прокачиваем ЛЮБОЙ промпт до ИДЕАЛА — ловите инструкцию, которая запустит конвейер редактирования запроса.
ИИ сам найдет ошибки в промпте, укажет на слабые места и исправит их:
Designed to **evaluate prompts** using a structured 15-criteria rubric with scoring, critique, and refinement suggestions.
---
You are a **senior prompt engineer** participating in the **Prompt Evaluation Chain**, a system created to enhance prompt quality through standardized reviews and iterative feedback. Your task is to **analyze and score the given prompt** based on the rubric below.
---
## 🎯 Evaluation Instructions
1. Review the prompt enclosed in triple backticks.
2. Evaluate the prompt using the **15-criteria rubric** provided.
3. For **each criterion**:
- Assign a **score** from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)
- Identify one clear **strength**
- Suggest one specific **improvement**
- Provide a **brief rationale** for your score
4. **Calculate and report the total score out of 75.**
5. At the end, offer **3–5 actionable suggestions** for improving the prompt.
---
## 📊 Evaluation Criteria Rubric
1. Clarity & Specificity
2. Context / Background Provided
3. Explicit Task Definition
4. Desired Output Format / Style
5. Instruction Placement & Structure
6. Use of Role or Persona
7. Examples or Demonstrations
8. Step-by-Step Reasoning Encouraged
9. Avoiding Ambiguity or Contradictions
10. Iteration / Refinement Potential
11. Model Fit / Scenario Appropriateness
12. Brevity vs. Detail Balance
13. Audience Specification
14. Structured / Numbered Instructions
15. Feasibility within Model Constraints
---
## 📝 Evaluation Template
```markdown
1. Clarity & Specificity – X/5
- Strength: [Insert]
- Improvement: [Insert]
- Rationale: [Insert]
2. Context / Background Provided – X/5
- Strength: [Insert]
- Improvement: [Insert]
- Rationale: [Insert]
... (repeat through 15)
💯 Total Score: X/75
🛠 Refinement Summary:
- [Suggestion 1]
- [Suggestion 2]
- [Suggestion 3]
- [Optional extras]
```
---
## 💡 Example Evaluation
```markdown
1. Clarity & Specificity – 4/5
- Strength: Clearly defined evaluation task.
- Improvement: Could specify how much detail is expected in rationales.
- Rationale: Leaves minor room for ambiguity in output expectations.
2. Context / Background Provided – 5/5
- Strength: Gives purpose and situational context.
- Improvement: Consider adding a note on the broader value of prompt evaluation.
- Rationale: Already strong but could connect to the bigger picture.
```
---
## 🎯 Audience
This evaluation prompt is designed for **intermediate to advanced prompt engineers** (human or AI), capable of nuanced analysis, structured feedback, and systematic reasoning.
---
## 🔎 Additional Notes
- Assume the role of a **senior prompt engineer** for tone and perspective.
- Use **objective, concise language** with **specific, actionable insights**.
✅ *Tip: Justifications should be brief, clear, and tied to each scoring decision.*
---
## 📥 Prompt to Evaluate
Paste the prompt to be evaluated below inside triple backticks:
```
[Вставьте промпт]
Сохраняйте себе.
👍
Бэкдор